|
Comparisons |
|
|
|
|
By allowing the expression of shared vocabularies, XML Schemas provide a means for defining the structure, content and semantics of XML documents. Here we compare XML Schemas with IFF, demonstrating the near identity of instance markup, but illustrating the difference between an XML Schema and an IFF ontology. |
|
||
|
CycL and IFF have a lot in common. Although CycL is more well-established. IFF is founded upon a rigorous categorical model theory. Here we gives correspondences between the basic notions and relations of CycL and IFF |
|
||
|
OIL and IFF |
|
|
|
|
XOL and IFF |
|
|
|
|
RDF/S and IFF |
|
|
|
|
CG and IFF |
|
|
|
|
OKBC and IFF |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||
|
Please send questions, comments and suggestions
about this page to: Robert E. Kent rekent@ontologos.org |
||
|
|||